A way of visualizing the diverse trends in child poverty over the past decade as a whole is
to look at countries with similar starting points but different trajectories. Three examples
are provided in Figure 15. In each case, countries that started off in much the same
position diverged strongly:
Figure 15.
Selected comparisons of trends in child income poverty rates
Sources:
See Technical Appendix
→ In 2012–2014, Poland had a child
poverty rate only slightly lower
than Chile and Luxembourg, but by
2019–2021 the difference was 7 and
10 percentage points, respectively.
Over 600,000 fewer children were in
poverty in Poland by the end of this
period compared to the start.
Child income poverty rate (%)
14
Child Poverty in the Midst of Wealth
13.5
11.6
10
10.0
8
Netherlands
(Kingdom of the)
Czechia
Slovenia
6
4
2
2012–2014
2019-2021
25
20
15
20.7
18.0
17.3
16.8
17.1
United Kingdom
Australia
Belgium
14.9
10
5
0
2012–2014
2019-2021
30
25
Luxembourg
23.6
23.4
22.6
20
15
24.5
21.6
Chile
Poland
14.1
10
5
0
28
14.6
13.6
13.4
12
0
Child income poverty rate (%)
→ The United Kingdom had a slightly
lower child poverty rate than
Australia and Belgium in 2012–2014
but had a rate 3 and 6 percentage
points higher, respectively, in
2019–2021. The increase in the
United Kingdom means that
around half a million more children
were in poverty in 2019–2021 than
seven years earlier.
16
Child income poverty rate (%)
→ Slovenia had a slightly higher
child poverty rate than the
Kingdom of the Netherlands in
2012–2014, but by 2019–2021
Slovenia’s child poverty rate was
around 4 percentage points lower
than that of the Kingdom of the
Netherlands. Czechia also made
good progress from a similar
starting point.
2012–2014
2019-2021
Innocenti Report Card 18
Hedef paragraf seç3
Bir paragrafa bağla
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
İçindekiler tablosuna ekle